PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
Citations
- 532 U.S. 661
- 121 S. Ct. 1879
- 149 L. Ed. 2d 904
- 2001 U.S. LEXIS 4115
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2634
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4294
- 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1281
- 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 271
- 69 U.S.L.W. 4367
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 4294
About this case
PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the applicability of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to professional golf tours .
The PGA Tour , the main organizer of professional golf tours in the United States, had required all golfers to walk between shots during the third stage of its qualifying tournament , which it argued was an important aspect of the game. Golfer Casey Martin , whose circulatory condition impaired his ability to walk, sued the PGA Tour under the ADA, asserting that it must accommodate his disability by allowing him to use a golf cart . The Supreme Court ruled for Martin in a 7–2 decision.[1]
Contents
Decision
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PGA_Tour,_Inc._v._Martin&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: Decision")
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Martin in a 7–2 decision. The court found that the PGA Tour should be viewed as a commercial enterprise operating in the entertainment industry for the economic benefit of its members rather than as a private club. It agreed with the Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin that the statutory definition of public accommodation included a "golf course", rejecting the Tour's argument that its competitions are only places of public accommodation in the areas open to spectators. The operator of a public accommodation could not, in Judge Coffin's view, create private enclaves within the facility "… and thus relegate the ADA to hop-scotch areas." The finding was originally upheld by the United States Court for the Ninth Circuit.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a dissent that concluded by referencing Kurt Vonnegut 's story "Harrison Bergeron ."
Aftermath
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PGA_Tour,_Inc._v._Martin&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: Aftermath")
Martin has failed to make it through the PGA Tour Q-school since 2000. He has played in several PGA Tour events, notably in 2004.[2] He lives in Eugene, Oregon and is the men's head golf coach at the University of Oregon .[3] Martin would go on to have his leg amputated, above the knee, in 2021.[4]
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PGA_Tour,_Inc._v._Martin&action=edit§ion=3 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001).
- ↑ "Casey Martin" . PGA Tour. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
- ↑ "Casey Martin" . University of Oregon Athletics. Retrieved August 9, 2022.
- ↑ Piastowski, Nick (October 16, 2021). "Casey Martin, who sued PGA Tour over cart use, loses right leg to amputation" . Golf Magazine. Retrieved February 16, 2026.
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PGA_Tour,_Inc._v._Martin&action=edit§ion=4 "Edit section: External links")
Text of PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
"Supreme Court says Martin can use cart on tour" . sportsillustrated.cnn.com. May 29, 2001. Archived from the original on June 5, 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
"Supreme Court upholds earlier Martin ruling" . ESPN. June 1, 2001. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
Robert S. Brown (2003). "Books Case studies in sport communication" . Praeger Publishers. ISBN 9780275975302 . Retrieved August 11, 2011.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PGA_Tour,_Inc._v._Martin&oldid=1351325895 "
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
Judges: Stevens, Scalia, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.