Skip to main content
· 10/29/1987

Maria P. v. Riles

Citations

  • 743 P.2d 932
  • 43 Cal. 3d 1281
  • 240 Cal. Rptr. 872
  • 1987 Cal. LEXIS 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under [Code of Civil Procedure section] 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
  • determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under § 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
  • determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under § 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
  • engaging in an examination of the record to conclude that \[t]his is precisely the type of public interest lawsuit that the private attorney general doctrine . . . was intended to foster\
  • awarding catalyst fees where the court issued a preliminary injunction against the defendants
  • awarding catalyst fees where the court issued a preliminary injunction against the defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broussard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.