California Supreme Court· 10/29/1987
Maria P. v. Riles
Citations
- 743 P.2d 932
- 43 Cal. 3d 1281
- 240 Cal. Rptr. 872
- 1987 Cal. LEXIS 449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under [Code of Civil Procedure section] 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
- determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under § 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
- determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under § 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants
- engaging in an examination of the record to conclude that \[t]his is precisely the type of public interest lawsuit that the private attorney general doctrine . . . was intended to foster\
- awarding catalyst fees where the court issued a preliminary injunction against the defendants
- awarding catalyst fees where the court issued a preliminary injunction against the defendants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broussard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2018-07-05· cited 1,051×
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-02-26· cited 949×
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-04-24· cited 380×
- Foust v. San Jose Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 2011-08-10· cited 348×
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 279×
- Hernandez v. California Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-02-23· cited 226×
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-09-21· cited 199×
- Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-03-02· cited 197×
- Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-04-01· cited 192×
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 183×
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2009-10-06· cited 182×
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-05-30· cited 177×
- Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-05-17· cited 161×
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2012-02-07· cited 160×
- Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court· 2016-08-11· cited 157×
- Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-11-15· cited 137×
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-03-28· cited 136×
- Gillan v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-02-21· cited 129×
- Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-02-11· cited 126×
- Elena S. v. KroutikCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-05-18· cited 111×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.