· 2/26/2001
Ketchum v. Moses
Citations
- 17 P.3d 735
- 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 377
- 24 Cal. 4th 1122
- 24 Cal. 1122
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1549
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1969
- 2001 Cal. LEXIS 916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the court has a burden to “carefully 15 review attorney documentation of hours expended” to determine whether the time reported was 16 reasonable
- requiring courts to consider the comparable rates in the “community” or “area”
- explaining “inefficient or duplicative efforts [are] not 22 subject to compensation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.