Skip to main content
· 2/26/2001

Ketchum v. Moses

Citations

  • 17 P.3d 735
  • 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 377
  • 24 Cal. 4th 1122
  • 24 Cal. 1122
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1549
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1969
  • 2001 Cal. LEXIS 916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the court has a burden to “carefully 15 review attorney documentation of hours expended” to determine whether the time reported was 16 reasonable
  • requiring courts to consider the comparable rates in the “community” or “area”
  • explaining “inefficient or duplicative efforts [are] not 22 subject to compensation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.