Marcus v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff must allege a label deficiency that defendant \could have corrected using the CBE regulation.\
• “Our review of the Supreme Court opinions discussed above makes clear that a necessary step in defeating Forest’s preemption defense is to establish that the complaint alleges a labeling deficiency that Forest could have corrected using the CBE regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).