Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/5/2008
Marco C. v. Sean C.
Citations
- 181 P.3d 1137
- 218 Ariz. 216
- 2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting father’s failure to timely register alone sufficient ground for proceeding with adoption without his consent and refusing to address issue related to untimely service of paternity action
- suggesting father’s failure to timely register alone sufficient ground for proceeding with adoption without his consent and refusing to address issue related to untimely service of paternity action
- “To soundly exercise its discretion, the court must also correctly apply the law.”
- “We may generally infer findings of fact necessary to sustain a court’s order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Pelander, Brammer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lehn v. Al-ThanayyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-07· cited 120×
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-24· cited 58×
- Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-10· cited 54×
- Aleise H. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-11-08· cited 36×
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C.Arizona Supreme Court· 2016-08-02· cited 27×
- Antonio M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-14· cited 25×
- Frank R. v. Mother Goose AdoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-08-18· cited 7×
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-08-27· cited 4×
- Logan B. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-24· cited 1×
- Haroutunian v. ValueoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-10
- Antonio M. v. Ades and Daniel M.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-29
- In Re Pima County Mental Health No. Mh20100047Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-08-18
- In re In reCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-02-28
- Doty-Perez v. Doty-PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-31
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,333×
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-04-28· cited 751×
- Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-05· cited 687×
- Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-20· cited 147×
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 144×
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court· 2007-02-26· cited 117×
- Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-05-18· cited 87×
- Johnson v. ElsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-24· cited 60×
- Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-08-31· cited 57×
- Heidbreder v. CartonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 55×
- Sanchez v. L.D.S. Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court· 1984-04-12· cited 50×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-06-27· cited 45×
- Beltran v. AllanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-10-24· cited 37×
- In Re Adoption of B.B.D.Utah Supreme Court· 1999-07-22· cited 32×
- Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 30×
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-13· cited 27×
- In Re Petition to Adopt O.J.M.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-10-29· cited 26×
- In re the Adoption of WCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-10-12· cited 21×
- Town of Miami v. City of GlobeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-03· cited 20×
- Hylland v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-01-19· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.