Second Circuit· 6/15/1995
Marbley v. Bane
Citations
- 57 F.3d 224
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Securing an enforceable decree or agreement may evidence prevailing party status.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,075×
- Stephen Moccio v. New York State Office of Court AdministrationSecond Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 221×
- Kapps v. WingSecond Circuit· 2005-04-04· cited 96×
- Perez v. Westchester County Department of CorrectionsSecond Circuit· 2009-11-19· cited 56×
- Bonner v. GuccioneSecond Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 47×
- McGrath v. Toys \R\ Us, Inc.Second Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 45×
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.Second Circuit· 1996-12-10· cited 41×
- Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceS.D. New York· 2002-05-24· cited 9×
- Morris v. West Palm Beach, City ofEleventh Circuit· 1999-11-03· cited 8×
- Kapps v. WingE.D. New York· 2003-09-19· cited 5×
- New York State National Organization for Women v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1999-10-26· cited 5×
- Foreman v. Dallas County TexasFifth Circuit· 1999-11-01· cited 3×
- J.C. Ex Rel. C. v. Regional School District No. 10D. Connecticut· 2000-09-28· cited 2×
- Donna McGrath Robert Jinks, A/K/A Tanya Jinks, A/K/A Tanya Medina, and Norbert Lopez, A/K/A Tara Lopez v. Toys \R\ Us, Inc.Second Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 1×
- Fauntleroy v. StaszakN.D. New York· 1998-05-01· cited 1×
- Bonner v. GuccioneSecond Circuit· 1999-05-27
- Richardson v. City of BostonD. Massachusetts· 2001-01-22
- Perez v. Westchester County Dep't of Corr.Second Circuit· 2009-11-19
- Diaz v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-01-14
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 3,072×
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,755×
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 973×
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court· 1994-11-14· cited 723×
- City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 583×
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentSecond Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 554×
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 334×
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-06-09· cited 274×
- Weinberger v. RossiSupreme Court· 1982-03-31· cited 223×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1993-09-27· cited 217×
- Eng v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1988-10-04· cited 136×
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Plaza Health Laboratories, Inc., Geronimo Villegas, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 90×
- S-1 and S-2 v. State Board of Education of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1994-04-04· cited 90×
- WVCH Communications, Inc. v. Upper Providence TownshipSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 78×
- Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court· 1993-01-12· cited 71×
- United States v. Harold Lawrence BlasiusSecond Circuit· 1968-11-18· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.