Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court rejected the employee’s contention that worker’s compensation exclusivity did not apply since the employer wore two hats as: (1) an employer and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1981-11-30· cited 78×
• Henning v. General Motors Assembly Division
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 29×
• State v. Purdy
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-10-12· cited 27×
• Farrall v. Armstrong Cork Co.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1983-01-28· cited 23×
• Hills v. Salt River Project Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-01-29· cited 19×
• Kosowan v. MDC Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-16· cited 14×
• Siva v. General Tire & Rubber Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-08-17· cited 13×
• Stone v. United States Steel Corp.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-05-23· cited 7×
• Therrell v. Scott Paper Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-02-25· cited 7×
• Bowen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-11-06· cited 5×
• Ritchie v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-05-14· cited 4×
• Windham v. Blount International, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1982-11-19· cited 2×
• Lowe v. Chemical Sealing Corp.
  N.D. Georgia· 1982-04-05· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• SHERMAN CON. PIPE MACH. INC. v. Gadsden Pipe Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-07-02· cited 26×
• Paul Krebs & Assoc. v. Matthews & Fritts Const.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1978-03-10· cited 23×
• Gunter v. US Fid. & Guar. Co.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-12-03· cited 9×
• Hubbard v. Cutts
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-05-07· cited 1×