Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/29/1985
Hills v. Salt River Project Ass'n
Citations
- 698 P.2d 216
- 144 Ariz. 421
- 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dual capacity doctrine conflicts with statute mandating exclusivity of workers' compensation remedy and with legislative purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brooks, Grant, Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Swichtenberg v. BrimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-19· cited 55×
- Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-13· cited 28×
- Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-17· cited 28×
- Schump v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-08-02· cited 25×
- Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 16×
- Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-05· cited 14×
- Allen v. Southwest Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-03-25· cited 11×
- Dunn v. Progress Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-06· cited 10×
- Caraccioli v. KFC Manufacturing Corp.M.D. Florida· 1991-04-12· cited 8×
- Mardian Const. Co. v. Sup. Court, Maricopa Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-05-19· cited 7×
- Gersten v. Sun Pain Management, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-04-18· cited 5×
- Dalton v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-12· cited 2×
- Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 1×
- Moore v. Toshiba International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-30· cited 1×
- Pallen v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.D. Oregon· 1998-03-17
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-04-18· cited 69×
- Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-08-16· cited 48×
- Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-08· cited 45×
- Stephens v. Textron, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 43×
- Halenar v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court· 1972-12-21· cited 32×
- Schlenk v. Aerial Contractors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 31×
- State v. PurdyAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-10-12· cited 27×
- K. W. Dart Truck Co. v. NobleArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-15· cited 26×
- Needham v. Fred's Frozen Foods, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-01-17· cited 25×
- Ong Hing v. Arizona Harness Raceway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-24· cited 24×
- Byars v. Arizona Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-08-26· cited 22×
- Martinez v. Bucyrus-Erie CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-22· cited 18×
- Robbins v. SeekampSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-04-02· cited 17×
- Mapson v. Montgomery White Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1978-04-21· cited 14×
- Jackson v. Northland Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 14×
- Strickland v. Textron, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1977-07-07· cited 13×
- Williams v. Magma Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-03-15· cited 12×
- Mariscal v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-04-07· cited 8×
- Denman v. Duval Sierrita CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-11-03· cited 7×
- Vineyard v. Southwest Engineering & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-08-02· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.