New Mexico Supreme Court· 4/26/1990

Maples v. State

Citations

791 P.2d 788
110 N.M. 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating “ ‘the law is clear that on procedural matters ..., a rule adopted by the Supreme Court governs over an inconsistent statute’ ”
applying provisions from both Rule 12-201 and Rule 12-601 to a workers' compensation case
applying provisions from both Rule 12-201 and Rule 12-601 to a workers’ compensation case
on procedural matters, such as time limitations for filing judicial proceedings, a rule adopted by the supreme court governs over an inconsistent statute
on procedural matters, a rule adopted by the supreme court governs over an inconsistent statute
\Supreme Court Rule 12-601 is the controlling rule in appeals from Workers' Compensation actions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Sosa, Wilson, Ransom, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.