Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/8/1987
Manze v. Manze
Citations
- 523 A.2d 821
- 362 Pa. Super. 153
- 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where paternity has been established either by consent or order, paternity is not a relevant fact in a later proceeding
- “exceptions [post-trial motions] may not be filed to a determination dismissing a petition to terminate support and that determination should be appealed directly.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Olszewski, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-07· cited 69×
- Barr v. BartoloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-15· cited 51×
- Gulla v. FitzpatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-29· cited 38×
- Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-03· cited 30×
- Kit v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-27· cited 28×
- Everett v. AnglemeyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-28· cited 26×
- Gebler v. GattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-02· cited 26×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Coburn v. CoburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-03· cited 24×
- Jones v. TrojakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 23×
- Brower v. BrowerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-09· cited 18×
- RUTH F. v. Robert B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-06· cited 17×
- Schultz v. ConnellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-04· cited 16×
- Ostrowski v. PethickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-14· cited 16×
- C.T.D. v. N.E.E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-09· cited 16×
- Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-06· cited 14×
- Scott v. MershonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-02· cited 14×
- Paulshock v. BonomoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-13· cited 12×
- Garman v. GarmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-23· cited 9×
- Hupp v. HuppSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-04-20· cited 8×
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-12-12· cited 8×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 96×
- United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-13· cited 78×
- Shindel v. LeedomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-31· cited 52×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goldman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-14· cited 50×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palchinski v. PalchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 40×
- Chrzanowski v. ChrzanowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-17· cited 38×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Nedzwecky v. NedzweckySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-04-14· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. AnwyllSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-28· cited 24×
- Baraff v. BaraffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-18· cited 17×
- Penjerdel Refrigeration Corp. v. R.A.C.S., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-26· cited 13×
- Cynthia H. v. Milton M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.