· 6/15/2007
Barr v. Bartolo
Citations
- 927 A.2d 635
- 2007 Pa. Super. 183
- 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to apply the presumption of paternity in a case where, although the mother and her husband remained married and had not sought a divorce at the time of the paternity hearing, they had been separated for several years and there was no intact family to preserve
- “[W]hile the parties remain married, there concededly is no intact family to preserve; hence, the [marital] presumption . . . is not applicable.”
- “[W]hile the parties remain married, there concededly is no intact family to preserve; hence, the [marital] presumption . . . is not applicable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Bowes and Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.