Skip to main content
· 6/15/2007

Barr v. Bartolo

Citations

  • 927 A.2d 635
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 183
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to apply the presumption of paternity in a case where, although the mother and her husband remained married and had not sought a divorce at the time of the paternity hearing, they had been separated for several years and there was no intact family to preserve
  • “[W]hile the parties remain married, there concededly is no intact family to preserve; hence, the [marital] presumption . . . is not applicable.”
  • “[W]hile the parties remain married, there concededly is no intact family to preserve; hence, the [marital] presumption . . . is not applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Bowes and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.