Manning v. General Motors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring defendant to serve supplemental written responses unconditionally representing that no responsive documents are in its possession, custody, or control
• “The ‘written submission’ requirement is met where the moving party requests sanctions in its motion or supporting brief and the opposing party is given the opportunity to submit a brief in response.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Heparin Products Liability Litigation
  N.D. Ohio· 2011-01-24· cited 32×
• Design Basics, L.L.C. v. Strawn
  D. Kansas· 2010-11-17· cited 15×
• Tumbling v. Merced Irrigation District
  E.D. California· 2009-10-13· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aramburu v. The Boeing Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-05-05· cited 472×
• McGowan v. The City of Eufaula
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-12-19· cited 174×
• Kutilek v. Gannon
  D. Kansas· 1990-09-24· cited 87×
• McCoo v. Denny's Inc.
  D. Kansas· 2000-04-18· cited 81×
• General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.
  D. Kansas· 2003-05-20· cited 81×
• Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority
  D. Kansas· 2004-03-31· cited 51×
• Directv, Inc. v. Puccinelli
  D. Kansas· 2004-11-23· cited 46×
• Horizon Holdings, L.L.C. v. Genmar Holdings, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 2002-05-30· cited 42×
• Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1999-10-01· cited 39×
• Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
• Owens v. Sprint/United Management Co.
  D. Kansas· 2004-06-02· cited 33×
• American Maplan Corp. v. Heilmayr
  D. Kansas· 2001-09-19· cited 27×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kansas City Southern Railway
  D. Kansas· 2000-06-28· cited 7×

Other cases named Manning v. General Motors

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Manning v. General Motors
  D. Kansas· 2008-01-07