Manley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the term “firearm” was commonly understood and did not need to be defined for the jury
• finding that a “handgun is, by definition, a firearm with certain characteristics” and that a handgun need not be operable to fit within the definition of a firearm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gibbs
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-05-23· cited 18×
• Staten v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-22· cited 14×
• Jermaine McKinley v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-10-06· cited 13×
• Morgan K. Govan v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 5×
• Ricky D. Wessel v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15
• Toya K. Radford v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-04-09

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Clark v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 108×
• Schiro v. Indiana
  Supreme Court· 1989-10-16· cited 58×
• Best v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-02-15· cited 54×
• Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 33×
• McNary v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-17· cited 33×
• McFarland v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 8×
• Sowell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-28· cited 3×
• Manley v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2×