Skip to main content
· 2/28/2006

Manifold v. Ragaglia

Citations

  • 891 A.2d 106
  • 94 Conn. App. 103
  • 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing denial of motion for summary judg- ment and remanding case for further proceedings when trial court improperly treated motion for summary judg- ment as motion to dismiss in relation to claim that court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
  • “[w]here the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation ... or this court will not review the claim” [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted]
  • ‘‘[i]n general, a motion to dismiss is the appropriate procedural vehi- cle to raise a claim that sovereign immunity . . . bars the action’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[w]here the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation . . . or this court will not review the claim” [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted]
  • articulation is proper vehicle to address matter overlooked in decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harper, Laveiy, Haiper, Foti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.