Connecticut Appellate Court· 2/28/2006

Manifold v. Ragaglia

Citations

891 A.2d 106
94 Conn. App. 103
2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing denial of motion for summary judg- ment and remanding case for further proceedings when trial court improperly treated motion for summary judg- ment as motion to dismiss in relation to claim that court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
“[w]here the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation ... or this court will not review the claim” [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted]
‘‘[i]n general, a motion to dismiss is the appropriate procedural vehi- cle to raise a claim that sovereign immunity . . . bars the action’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
“[w]here the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation . . . or this court will not review the claim” [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted]
articulation is proper vehicle to address matter overlooked in decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harper, Laveiy, Haiper, Foti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Manifold v. Ragaglia

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.