Mandell v. Mandell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 61.121 did not set aside the long held presumption that rotating custody is not in the best interest of a minor child
• holding that section 61.121 did not set aside the long held presumption that rotating custody is not in the best interest of a minor child
• finding that “[i]f ... the legislature sought to set aside the presumption against rotating custody [by the enactment of section 61.121], it failed”
• affirming rotating custody plan where trial court relied on expert's testimony
• affirming rotating custody plan where trial court relied on expert's testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cooper v. Gress
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 40×
• Chapman v. Prevatt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 15×
• Mancuso v. Mancuso
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-01· cited 6×
• Corey v. Corey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30· cited 6×
• Hosein v. Hosein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-23· cited 4×
• Mudafort v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-08· cited 4×
• Boardman v. Roy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-25· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Bienvenu v. Bienvenu
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-11· cited 29×