Chapman v. Prevatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Nothing in section 61.121 detracts from the long-standing presumption frowning upon a rotating custody arrangement.\
• reversing trial court’s order establishing annual, rotating custody where the parents lived in different states and the trial court made no findings that the children would be better suited by a rotating arrangement
• reversing trial court's order establishing annual, rotating custody where the parents lived in different states and the trial court made no findings that the children would be better suited by a rotating arrangement
• “The mother’s desire to relocate to Colorado, in the absence of other compelling circumstances, does not in and of itself support a change of custody.”
• “That parents do not get along with one another is not a substantial or material change in circumstances which, without more, justifies a change of custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).