Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 4/17/1996

Mandel v. Allen

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 478
  • 1996 WL 181423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order to state a due process claim, appellant ‘must first demonstrate that [they] possess[] a “cognizable property interest, rooted in state law” in the lost benefit.’” (quoting Biser v. Town of Bel Air, 991 F.2d 100, 103-04 (4th Cir. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Wilkins, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mandel v. Allen

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.