· 12/20/2005
Virginia Department of Corrections v. Compton
Citations
- 623 S.E.2d 397
- 47 Va. App. 202
- 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 517
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a written notice informed the grievant of the charges against him because it put him on notice of the “behavior” that led to the termination of his employment
- finding that because a terminated employee had a protected interest, this Court “must next determine whether VDOC provided adequate procedural safeguards under the circumstances of this case” before terminating him (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Felton, Humphreys, McCLANAHAN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.