Skip to main content
· 12/20/2005

Virginia Department of Corrections v. Compton

Citations

  • 623 S.E.2d 397
  • 47 Va. App. 202
  • 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a written notice informed the grievant of the charges against him because it put him on notice of the “behavior” that led to the termination of his employment
  • finding that because a terminated employee had a protected interest, this Court “must next determine whether VDOC provided adequate procedural safeguards under the circumstances of this case” before terminating him (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Felton, Humphreys, McCLANAHAN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.