Mancz v. McHenry
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 82
Syllabus
A jury found that appellant-wife fraudulently transferred real estate and four bank accounts to appellant-husband. The trial court properly considered the appellants' objection to allegedly inadmissible evidence being used by the jury. The magistrate who conducted the parties' jury trial properly entered judgment on the jury's verdicts. The appellee's claim for fraudulent transfer of real estate was not barred by res judicata. The trial court did not err in upholding the magistrate's decision allowing the appellants' prior attorney to testify despite a claim that his testimony disclosed privileged communications. The trial court correctly upheld the magistrate's decision denying a mistrial. The trial court did not err in upholding the magistrate's denial of a directed-verdict motion. The trial court's judgment is not subject to reversal with respect to finding a fraudulent transfer based on the transfer of money from a bank account held by the appellants jointly to another bank account held by the appellants jointly. With respect to the questioned account, the evidence supported a conclusion that there was a previous fraudulent transfer of assets solely in wife's name to a joint account with husband, within the four-year statute of limitations. The trial court did not err in upholding a finding that one of the appellants transferred assets to the other appellant with actual intent to hinder, defraud, or delay a creditor. The trial court did not err in upholding a finding that funds allegedly returned to the transferor appellant should be included as a fraudulent transfer the jury was free to disbelieve that the transferee appellant actually returned the funds to the transferor appellant. The trial court did not err in upholding a finding that the appellee suffered damages as a result of fraudulent transfers. The trial court did not err in overruling objections to the magistrate's denial of the appellants' summary-judgment motion. The appellants have not demonstrated
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martcheva v. Dayton Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-01· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Hicks v. Fraley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-08-12· cited 13×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-07· cited 10×
- In re Adoption of G.A.J.-K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-11· cited 2×
- Alegre, Inc. v. Hyde Component Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-25· cited 1×
- Mancz v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-16· cited 1×
- Marchbanks v. Inland Prods., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-03
- Goebel v. Colonial Lane Improvement Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court· 1994-07-27· cited 529×
- Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 376×
- Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-14· cited 177×
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 130×
- State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court· 2005-04-13· cited 102×
- Jackson v. GregerOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-11· cited 63×
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr.Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-07-26· cited 37×
- Terry v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-12-22· cited 19×
- Mancz v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-20· cited 12×
- Amesse v. Wright State Physicians, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-02· cited 8×
- Weaner & Assocs., L.L.C. v. 369 W. First, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-10· cited 6×
- Prouse, Dash & Crouch, L.L.P. v. DiMarcoOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-03-06· cited 5×
- Gustafson v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-30· cited 4×
- Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis, L.P.A. v. MalmOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-06-04· cited 4×
- Cranford v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-23· cited 3×
- In re Estate of WeinerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 3×
- Maddox v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-11· cited 2×
- Bailey v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.