Skip to main content
· 10/1/2021

Martcheva v. Dayton Bd. of Edn.

Citations

  • 179 N.E.3d 687
  • 2021 Ohio 3524

Syllabus

In this multi-party, multi-claim employment suit, the trial court did not err in its damages determination. It also did not abuse its discretion by not granting appellant's request for attorney fees, as she did not demonstrate that appellee, Dayton Board of Education, acted in bad faith. Further, the trial court did not err in granting appellees' motion for summary judgment on various tort claims raised against both the Board of Education and individual district employees. Similarly, the trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion for summary judgment against school district employees. Finally, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered appellant's counsel to pay $470 in attorney fees. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.