Lazcano v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding general similarities between sexual assault offenses were “wholly innocuous as such features would tend to be common to many cases”
• holding general similarities between sexual assault offenses were “wholly innocuous as such features would tend to be common to many cases”
• finding extraneous offense evidence was admissible to prove identity, intent, motive, or common plan or scheme if it has relevance apart from proving character conformity
• wherein the State’s use of another bad act as the “clincher” was harmful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).