Mississippi Supreme Court· 8/19/1992
Mallett v. State
Citations
- 606 So. 2d 1092
- 1992 WL 282126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[E]very murder done with deliberate design to effect the death of another human being is by definition done in the commission of an act imminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved heart, regardless of human life.”
- Because Mallett failed to request a jury an instruction on the lesser included offense of manslaughter and because the jury was properly instructed on self-defense or justifiable homicide, this Court found the issue regarding jury instructions to be without merit.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Robertson and McRae
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Catchings v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 90×
- Tait v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-02-22· cited 81×
- Hurns v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 70×
- Timothy Nelson Evans v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 69×
- Young v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 63×
- Langston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2001-05-22· cited 52×
- State v. ShawMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-08-12· cited 41×
- Clayton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 33×
- Turner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 23×
- Hawkins v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2012-09-20· cited 22×
- Sanders v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 20×
- Readus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-04-22· cited 19×
- Schuck v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 18×
- Franklin Fitzpatrick v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2015-07-23· cited 15×
- Slater v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-01-14· cited 14×
- Glaskox v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-08-03· cited 11×
- Rouster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2007-11-20· cited 10×
- Lett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-03-01· cited 9×
- Rushing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-02-08· cited 9×
- Staten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-01-29· cited 8×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wetz v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-02-25· cited 619×
- Heidel v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-09-11· cited 332×
- Pinkton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-11-27· cited 276×
- Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-01-27· cited 242×
- Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1985-09-04· cited 202×
- Harveston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-08-20· cited 164×
- Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 116×
- United States v. Gina Antoinette BrownerFifth Circuit· 1989-11-16· cited 106×
- Stevens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-10-17· cited 90×
- Blanks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 85×
- Windham v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-05-20· cited 84×
- Graham v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-06-05· cited 55×
- Dickerson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-12-07· cited 47×
- Fairman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-09-16· cited 39×
- Griffin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-10-08· cited 39×
- Goldsby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-03-28· cited 32×
- MOAK v. BlackMississippi Supreme Court· 1957-03-04· cited 31×
- McMullen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1974-03-11· cited 18×
- MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court· 1976-03-16· cited 15×
- PAIRLEE ROGERS v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1955-01-03· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.