Mallen v. Mallen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “the wishes of the spouse seem to command first consideration”
• stating “the wishes of the spouse seem to command first consideration”
• disinterment and relocation of husband’s body from family plot allowed due to hostility between husband’s family and widow
• disinterment and relocation of husband's body from family plot allowed due to hostility between husband's family and widow

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wolf v. Rose Hill Cemetery Ass'n
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-08-10· cited 8×
• In Re Spiers
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2008-08-21· cited 3×
• Lee Augustus McGriggs, Sr. v. Mac Arthur McGriggs
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-12-15· cited 2×
• Carmen D. Hastings v. Joel Scott Spiers
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2007-01-10
• In Re: Remains of Chester Howard West
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2017-06-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pettigrew v. Pettigrew
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-01-04· cited 90×
• Goldman v. Mollen
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1937-06-10· cited 19×
• Sacred Heart of Jesus Polish National Catholic Church v. Soklowski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-05-16· cited 18×
• Brake v. Mother of God's Cemetery
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-12-08· cited 10×