Maldonado Maldonado v. Lausell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the admission of evidence that the defendant was considering pleading guilty to the charge against him and accepting a six year prison term was highly prejudicial and potentially influenced the jury’s decision
• noting the admission of inadmissible testimony alone does not automatically require a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).