Maharaj v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the State’s improper burden-shifting comments during closing argument did not constitute fundamental error but reversing on other grounds
• “The standard of review of a determination of whether a party has opened the door is abuse of discretion as limited by the rules of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carlos Manuel Russell v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-16· cited 1×
• Edwards-Freeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-25· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Northard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-12· cited 18×
• Siegel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-27· cited 18×
• Wicklow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-04· cited 12×
• Shermer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-19· cited 6×
• Covington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 6×
• Ocasio v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-10· cited 5×
• Dunlap v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-28· cited 4×
• Joseph v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-07· cited 3×