Skip to main content
· 11/8/2001

Mahand v. Delaney

Citations

  • 60 S.W.3d 371
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 7527
  • 2001 WL 1382498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Craddock applies in both no-answer and post-answer defaults
  • extending Lopez in lack-of-notice cases to also dispense with third Craddock requirement of showing motion for new trial would not cause delay or injury
  • “Even a slight excuse may justify a new trial.”
  • “Even a slight excuse may justify a new trial.”
  • “Even a slight excuse may justify a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Hedges, Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.