Wiseman v. Levinthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ―The defendant’s allegation in his motion for new trial, that his failure to answer was not due to conscious indifference, was neither verified not supported by an affidavit; thus, it provides no competent evidence of that fact.‖
• “The defendant’s allegation in his motion for new trial, that his failure to answer was not due to conscious indifference, was neither verified not supported by an affidavit; thus, it provides no competent evidence of that fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).