Michigan Court of Appeals· 9/27/1996
Magee v. Magee
Citations
- 553 N.W.2d 363
- 218 Mich. App. 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the party seeking to include an asset for distribution in the property settlement bears the burden of proving the reasonably ascertainable value of the asset
- recognizing that the party seeking to include an asset for distribution in the property settlement bears the burden of proving the reasonably ascertainable value of the asset
- concluding that marital assets which produced no income did not offset the great disparity in the parties’ respective monthly incomes or eliminate the need for cash flow to meet expenses
- holding that the trial court erred by awarding the entirety of a pension to the plaintiff where proofs regarding the value of the pension were not produced by either party
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion because the evidence showed that the award left the plaintiff with no reduction in his financial position whereas it left the defendant impoverished in the short term
- explaining that “the alimony award goes hand in glove with the property distribution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffin, Smolensk, Borrello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-12-11· cited 294×
- Gates v. GatesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-07-01· cited 135×
- Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-01-08· cited 126×
- Pickering v. PickeringMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-11-29· cited 84×
- In Re Costs and Attorney FeesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-05-31· cited 65×
- Korth v. KorthMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-05-29· cited 61×
- Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-09-11· cited 45×
- In Re Estate of HerbachMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-09-10· cited 33×
- McCartney v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-12-18· cited 29×
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-16· cited 20×
- Koy v. KoyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-07-10· cited 17×
- Nathan v. Libra (In re Libra)E.D. Michigan· 2018-05-09· cited 5×
- People v. CarlinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-12-23· cited 3×
- Powell Production, Inc. v. Jackhill Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-02-26· cited 3×
- Ltc Pamela Joy Lee Johnson Do v. Edgar Johnson IIIMichigan Court of Appeals· 2019-07-18
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hanaway v. HanawayMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 72×
- McDOUGAL v McDOUGALMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-04-02· cited 43×
- Jansen v. JansenMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-05-03· cited 37×
- In Re PowersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-02-06· cited 36×
- Lee v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-08-29· cited 28×
- Perry v. PerryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-04-02· cited 21×
- Ianitelli v. IanitelliMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-05-18· cited 16×
- Boonstra v. BoonstraMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-04-03· cited 12×
- Hover v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-10· cited 12×
- Demman v. DemmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-20· cited 11×
- Beaty v. BeatyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-04-04· cited 9×
- Keen v. KeenMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-05-04· cited 7×
- Keen v. KeenMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-05-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.