Skip to main content
· 12/13/1988

Magee v. Essex-Tec Corp.

Citations

  • 704 F. Supp. 543
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15474
  • 1988 WL 146868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting a transfer from Delaware to California because of the hardship posed to the defendant, a small California company with only 25 employees
  • finding transfer proper when defendants as to whom venue in transferee court would have been improper have been brought in the transferee forum—is satisfied. The Court therefore turns to the second step of the § 1404(a
  • prolonged absence of witnesses, all key employees of Defendant, would cause severe financial hardship to the Defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Longobardi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.