Skip to main content
· 8/13/1998

Corry v. CFM Majestic Inc.

Citations

  • 16 F. Supp. 2d 660
  • 1998 WL 480666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a patent infringement claim against a distributer of infringing products is peripheral to a claim against the manufacturer
  • holding that the adjudication of claims against an infringing product’s manufacturer would resolve claims against a mere distributer
  • noting severance prevents a plaintiff from manipulating joinder rules to burden “defendant who otherwise would have been entitled to a [transfer of venue].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.