Magann Equipment, Inc. v. Buffkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the MCS-90 makes the underlying policy primary, even in an allocation dispute among insurers
• “[Because the endorsement is such an integral part of the ICC regulatory scheme, selective application of the endorsement ... would not satisfy the requirements of Brada.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).