Nolt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the insured is entitled to recovery of the attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred” (emphasis added)
• stating that the “attorneys fees and expenses . . . incurred in connection with this [declaratory judgment action] were the direct result of the breach of contract by [the insurer]” and directing the court to “assess those damages” on remand
• stating that the “attorneys fees and expenses . . . incurred in connection with this [declaratory judgment action] were the direct result of the breach of contract by [the insurer]” and directing the court to “assess those damages” on remand
• stating that the “attorneys fees and expenses . . . incurred in connection with this [declaratory judgment action] were the direct result of the breach of contract by [the insurer]” and directing the court to “assess those damages” on remand
• explaining “the primary principle of construction [when analyzing insurance policies,] is to apply the terms of the insurance contract itself”
• describing an Other Insurance clause that provided the share and proportion of the insurance that the policy covered as a “typical pro rata clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).