Ninth Circuit· 8/30/1999
Madrid v. Gomez
Citations
- 190 F.3d 990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the right is limited, and that 20 prisoners need only have the minimal help necessary to file legal claims
- “The scope of the right of access to the courts is quite limited[.]”
- The Board of Industrial Appeals is not a 15 named defendant here
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Scannlain, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harris v. GarnerEleventh Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 388×
- Erineo Cano v. Nicole TaylorNinth Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 211×
- Walker v. BainSixth Circuit· 2001-07-20· cited 156×
- Boivin v. BlackFirst Circuit· 2000-09-07· cited 147×
- Cedric Johnson v. George M. Daley, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 2003-08-19· cited 103×
- Christopher John Dillingham v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 83×
- Hadix v. JohnsonSixth Circuit· 2000-10-04· cited 78×
- Claudius ATKINSON, Appellant. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATESThird Circuit· 2007-03-08· cited 41×
- Madrid v. GomezNinth Circuit· 1999-08-30· cited 35×
- Earnest Woods, Ii v. Santos CervantesNinth Circuit· 2013-07-17· cited 34×
- Parker v. ConwayThird Circuit· 2009-09-17· cited 24×
- Balla v. IdahoNinth Circuit· 2012-04-17· cited 23×
- Robert Webb v. Ada CountyNinth Circuit· 1999-10-29· cited 16×
- Carbonell v. AcrishS.D. New York· 2001-04-18· cited 14×
- Dannenberg v. ValadezNinth Circuit· 2003-08-11· cited 13×
- Perez v. CateNinth Circuit· 2011-01-13· cited 10×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 2000-10-04· cited 1×
- Phillips v. HustD. Oregon· 2004-03-31· cited 1×
- Johnson v. HornungS.D. California· 2005-02-17· cited 1×
- McLindon v. RussellS.D. Ohio· 1999-12-16· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 2,387×
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,199×
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 1,746×
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 1,322×
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 851×
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 679×
- Martin v. HadixSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 345×
- Gates v. RowlandNinth Circuit· 1994-11-04· cited 162×
- Kurt Zehner, Jerry Glenn, John Alvarado, Individually and on Behalf of Similarly Situated Inmates v. Clarence Trigg, Bruce Brown, John SchillingSeventh Circuit· 1997-12-31· cited 119×
- Clarence Duke McGann v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationSecond Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 108×
- Haitian Refugee Center, an Unincorporated, Not for Profit Organization v. Edwin Meese, III , Attorney General of the United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1986-06-24· cited 86×
- Rosenfeld v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1988-10-12· cited 66×
- Haitian Refugee Center, an Unincorporated, Not-For Profit Organization v. Edwin Meese, IIIEleventh Circuit· 1986-12-04· cited 52×
- Madrid v. GomezNinth Circuit· 1998-07-02· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.