Madison Ex Rel. M.M. v. Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining adequate time for discovery had passed when, among other things, lawsuit had been pending for over one year and non-movant filed her own no-evidence summary judgment motion
• considering the fact that appellant “made no effort to specify the additional evidence she needed to respond to the motion, or the reason she could not obtain it during the discovery period” when determining whether appellant had an adequate time for discovery
• successful party at trial must submit record of its court costs to court clerk, either before or after judgment is entered, so that clerk can perform its ministerial duty and tax costs in accordance with Rule 622

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).