Skip to main content
· 4/8/2002

Macktal v. Chao

Citations

  • 286 F.3d 822
  • 2002 WL 448593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a 7 Case: 18-10038 Date Filed: 05/18/2020 Page: 8 of 10 “motion for reconsideration, filed within a reasonable time after the order [with the DOL ARB], [is] effective to toll the appeal period”
  • holding a 7 Case: 18-10038 Date Filed: 05/18/2020 Page: 8 of 10 “motion for reconsideration, filed within a reasonable time after the order [with the DOL ARB], [is] effective to toll the appeal period”
  • “Reconsideration must also occur within a reasonable time after the first decision . . . .”
  • An agency’s reconsideration of a prior decision “must . . . occur within a reasonable time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Demoss, Lake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.