N.D. Texas· 8/7/2015

Hollis v. Lynch

Citations

121 F. Supp. 3d 617
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103656
2015 WL 4713277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction”
noting that “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction” (citing Cobb v. Cent. States, 461 F.3d 632, 635 (5th Cir. 2006))
noting that “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction” (citing Cobb v. Cent. States, 461 F.3d 632, 635 (5th Cir. 2006))
noting that “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction” (citing Cobb v. Cent. States, 461 F.3d 632, 635 (5th Cir. 2006)). The requirement of standing has three elements: (1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3
noting that “whether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction” (citing Cobb v. Cent. States, 461 F.3d 632, 635 (5th Cir. 2006)). The requirement of standing has three elements: (1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3
\[W]hether a party has proper standing is a question of subject matter jurisdiction.\ (citing Cobb v. Cent. States , 461 F.3d 632 , 635 (5th Cir. 2006) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbara, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.