E.D. Michigan· 6/7/1976
MacK v. United States Postal Service
Citations
- 414 F. Supp. 504
- 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[I]t is within the power of the agency to start the running of the six-month period at any time by sending a written notice of denial.\
- “[I]t is within the power of the agency to start the running of the six-month period at any time by sending a written notice of denial.”
- “this interpretation may seem to be the equivalent of no limitation of action, [but] it appears to be the most reasonable reading of the statutory scheme”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feikens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Leonhard v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1980-08-28· cited 171×
- Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1986-02-27· cited 170×
- Bailey v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 63×
- Thurman Conn v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1989-02-09· cited 37×
- Boyd v. United StatesW.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-01-17· cited 24×
- Sharon R. Miller v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1984-09-12· cited 22×
- Pascale v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1993-07-08· cited 18×
- Blue v. United StatesD. Connecticut· 1983-07-14· cited 15×
- James R. Taumby v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1990-05-14· cited 13×
- James E. McCormick and Carol Ann McCormick Etc. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1981-05-18· cited 11×
- Chambly v. LindyN.D. Indiana· 1985-02-04· cited 9×
- John Bailey v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1981-04-20
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1993-07-08
Other cases named MacK v. United States Postal Service
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.