Thurman Conn v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a requirement that the claimant exercise the option within a “reasonable” time, observing, “the language of the statute places the option in the claimant’s hands”
• collecting cases showing lack of “documentation of the authority of the person filing on behalf of the claimant . . . does not render the form an ineffective presentment for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).