Skip to main content

MacK v. State

Citations

  • 955 So. 2d 51
  • 2007 WL 879016

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that, because appellate counsel could have preserved Apprendi issue by filing 3.800(b)(2) motion before the first brief was served, it is no defense to petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance that appellate counsel (like trial counsel) failed to do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.