MacIas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was error to increase a mandatory minimum sentence once the court entered a written sentence which the appellant had begun serving
• \[A]n increase of a lawful sentence is expressly prohibited by case law and constitutes double jeopardy.\
• \[A]n increase of a lawful sentence is expressly prohibited by case law and constitutes double jeopardy.\
• where trial court sentenced defendant to ten years with three years minimum mandatory, court erred in entering order changing sentence to mandatory minimum ten years nunc pro tunc to original sentencing date, even if original pronouncement was oversight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sandoval
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 19×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-19· cited 18×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-14· cited 16×
• Gartrell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-25· cited 8×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-21· cited 5×
• M.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27· cited 4×
• Grage v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-13· cited 2×
• MH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jolly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-07· cited 86×
• Farber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-12· cited 30×
• Cherry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-26· cited 19×
• Rizzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-29· cited 8×