Skip to main content

People v. Sandoval

Citations

  • 974 P.2d 1012
  • 1998 WL 326893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the presumption of concurrency to a sentence when the record was silent as to concurrency or consecutiveness
  • “Although a court may correct an illegal sentence without implicating double jeopardy concerns, it may not increase a lawful sentence after the defendant has begun serving it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Rothenberg, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.