MacArthur v. Nashua Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dependency for workers’ compensation purposes requires only in loco parentis relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Williams
  D. New Hampshire· 1994-07-27· cited 12×
• Duhaime v. Treasurer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-11-19· cited 3×
• Gelinas v. Sterling Industrial Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-09-21· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faber v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1933-02-23· cited 40×
• In Re Diana P.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-12-10· cited 26×
• Heinz v. Concord Union School District
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-03-31· cited 26×
• Hurley v. Public Service Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-08-31· cited 21×
• Gagne v. Garrison Hill Greenhouses, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1954-12-15· cited 13×
• Binet v. Ocean Gate Bd. of Education
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1966-03-29· cited 12×
• Claim of Landon v. Motorola, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1971-12-20· cited 10×
• Miles v. Theobald Industries
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-11-15· cited 7×
• Custer v. Reitz Coal Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-12-29· cited 5×
• Juneau Lumber Co. v. Alaska Industrial Board
  D. Alaska· 1954-07-30· cited 5×
• Browning v. City of Huntsville
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1971-02-03· cited 2×