Custer v. Reitz Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing section 307 of the Act, the court stated, “The enumeration in the Act of those entitled as claimants is to a great extent for the purpose of establishing priority of right.”
• where all incidents of parent-child relationship were present except that claimant did not give birth to decedent-employee, grandmother was “mother” within categories set forth in compensation laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sullivan Electric Co. v. McDonald
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1976-07-26· cited 5×
• MacArthur v. Nashua Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-11· cited 3×
• Browning v. City of Huntsville
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1971-02-03· cited 2×
• Snader v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-05-15· cited 1×
• Coveleski v. M. A. Hanna Co.
  Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1957-02-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Harvey v. Philadelphia Warehouse & Cold Storage Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-07-20· cited 7×