MacAbio v. TIG Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this court can employ subsequent legislative history “to confirm its interpretation of an earlier statutory provision”
• concluding that a coverage offer satisfied prong two, as the chart enclosed with the letter detailing the options included four columns which separately specified the limits of stacked and unstacked UM and UIM benefits
• noting that mailing is a commercially reasonable method to communicate with an insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).