Sol v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was unnecessary to interpret vague and ambiguous terms of an insurance contract because to the extent that the contract terms conflicted with statutory language, “the statute must take precedence over the terms of the contract”
• holding that it was unnecessary to interpret vague and unambiguous terms of an insurance contract because to the extent that the contract terms conflicted with statutory language, \the statute must take precedence over the terms of the contract\
• “because [HRS § 431:10C-301(b)(3) ] provides that uninsured motorist coverage may be rejected, it is ‘optional’ additional coverage” (emphasis in the original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).