District of Columbia· 7/3/2002
Maalouf v. Swiss Confederation
Citations
- 208 F. Supp. 2d 31
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12175
- 2002 WL 1448298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Swiss Embassy’s failure to warn about a guide wire on a tree that caused a sledding accident was not grounded in public policy
- holding Swiss Embassy was not protected by sovereign immunity for decisions as to maintenance of the Embassy’s grounds because such decisions were made in its capacity as a land owner, not in its capacity as an diplomatic mission
- distinguishing decisions made by a government body as a mere landowner from those made as a result of “policy-making duties” uniquely governmental in nature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-19· cited 34×
- USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. PERMANENT MISSION OF NAMIBIASecond Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 28×
- Walen v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-31· cited 27×
- Suzanne Matheny v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 19×
- ESTATE OF GAITHER EX REL. GAITHER v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-08· cited 15×
- Krombein v. Gali Service Industries, Inc.District of Columbia· 2004-05-06· cited 6×
- Romero v. ITW Food Equipment Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-10-30· cited 5×
- Hsieh v. CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.District of Columbia· 2010-03-26· cited 3×
- Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United StatesD. Maryland· 2015-01-13· cited 3×
- Boteach v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaD. New Jersey· 2010-12-22
- Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-08
- Matheny, Suzanne v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2006-12-04
- Usoyan v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-02-06
- Kurd v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-02-06
- Yang v. Ics Protective ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-28
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 2,087×
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,883×
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,618×
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-17· cited 1,192×
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 355×
- John R. Cope v. Roland G. Scott United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1995-01-20· cited 166×
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-02· cited 160×
- Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-30· cited 89×
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-11-21· cited 71×
- Everett Todd Faber v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 69×
- Scoggins v. JudeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-09-04· cited 67×
- Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1953-12-10· cited 62×
- Skelton v. Twin County Rural Elec. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 57×
- Jarrett v. Woodward Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-05-25· cited 55×
- MacArthur Area Citizens Association v. Republic of PeruD.C. Circuit· 1987-01-23· cited 52×
- Holland v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-29· cited 52×
- Sandoe v. Lefta AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-12· cited 42×
- Shu v. BasingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1948-01-14· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.