Fifth Circuit· 10/18/2018

M. D. Ex Rel. Stukenberg v. Abbott

Citations

907 F.3d 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a federal court could require a state foster care system to implement training, investigative, reporting, and computer systems policies
holding that the constitutionality of “the State’s policies with respect to caseload management, monitoring, and oversight” was properly adjudicated “on a class-wide basis”
concluding that courts do not require state officials to be warned of a \ specific danger\ to be held liable for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need (emphasis in original)
concluding that courts do not require state officials to be warned of a “specific danger” to be held liable for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need
concluding that courts do not require state officials to be warned of a “specific danger” to be held liable for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need
concluding that courts do not require state officials to be warned of a \ specific danger\ to be held liable for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Smith, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.