Lynn v. McCue
Citations
- 99 Kan. 400
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Equitable Action — Appeal—Jurisdiction of Trial Court to Interpret Mandate — Retrial—Appeal too Late — Mandamus—Writ Denied. A decision was given upon an appeal in a complicated, equitable action which involved controversies of a complex character between a number of parties holding conflicting claims. The judgment was affirmed in part and reversed in part, directions being given as to the trial of the undetermined.issues. When the mandate was spread of record .and the case was again brought before the trial court that court was vested with jurisdiction and power to interpret the decision and mandate of the supreme court which, it is held, were fairly open to interpretation, and it's interpretation of the decision as well as its rulings and judgment in the second trial, however erroneous, can not be regarded as absolutely void,' but must be treated as errors to be corrected on appeal, and can not be corrected by a proceeding in mandamus.</p>
Judges: Dawson, Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-03-09· cited 25×
- Clevenger v. FigleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-03-12· cited 20×
- Hargis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-01-07· cited 19×
- Lynn v. McCueSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-04-10· cited 11×
- McDonald v. SwisherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1899-06-10· cited 10×
- Lynn v. McCueSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-07-10· cited 5×
- Weishaar v. HaenkySupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-05-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.