Skip to main content
· 3/12/1904

Clevenger v. Figley

Citations

  • 68 Kan. 699
  • 75 P. 1001
  • 1904 Kan. LEXIS 164

Syllabus

<p>syllabus by the court.</p> <p>Practice, District Court — Foreclosure—Joint Consent — Judgment Conclusive. In an action to foreclose a mortgage given by the owner of land jointly with the guardian'of his insane wife, the district court has jurisdiction to determine whether or not the premises were a homestead at the time the mortgage was executed, and to decide whether or not the instrument expressed the joint consent of husband and wife; and a judgment involving an erroneous decision of those matters is not open to collateral attack, but is valid and binding upon the parties and their privies until corrected in a direct proceeding for that purpose.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • An insurance agent who procures an insurance policy has no authority to cancel the policy on behalf of the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.