Skip to main content

Lusk v. State

Citations

  • 82 S.W.3d 57
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2028
  • 2002 WL 423149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court has a broad range of remedies to stop and alleviate harm
  • holding that the trial court has a broad range of remedies to stop and alleviate harm
  • stating that testimony, as it related to extraneous offenses and to appellant = s guilt for assault, was not such that its effect was incurable by the jury being instructed to disregard
  • “On appeal, we generally presume the jury follows the trial court’s instructions in the manner presented.” (internal citations omitted)
  • finding waiver of 14th amendment right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd, C.J., and Quinn and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.